Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Egerton University & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU JUDICIAL REVIEW NO.1 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSITIES ACT (ACT NO.42 OF 2012) LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION OF THE SENATE, EGERTON UNIVERSITY DATED 11TH OCTOBER, 2013 EXPELLING PATEL MAULIK PRASUN AND IN THE MATTER OF THE VIOLATION OF THE APPLICANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES ACT AND THE EGERTON UNIVERSITY STATUTES BETWEEN REPUBLIC............................................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS EGERTON UNIVERSITY.................................................................................RESPONDENT PATEL MAULIK PRASUN......................................................................................SUBJECT RULING This is my “ex-tempore” order. I hereby allow the application and hereby set aside the orders granted on 8/7/2015 for the following reasons: No receipt for fees for years lll has been availed by the Respondent. Secondly, there has been delay and indolence in prosecution of the substantive motion with no reasonable explanation. The subject is well advised to set down the Judicial Review for hearing and determination.

page 1 of 2

Costs shall be in the cause. It is so ordered. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nakuru this 17th day of July, 2015. A. MSHILA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.