Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Josphat Kimanzi Munyoki & 1 other v Kavata Munywoki Kitu

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS MISC. APPLICATION (P & A) NO. 264 OF 2015 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MUNYWOKI KITU MULUNGA JOSPHAT KIMANZI MUNYOKI........................1ST APPLICANT JONES MUTHENGI MUNYOKI.......................2ND APPLICANT VERSUS KAVATA MUNYWOKI KITU..............................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application dated 27th April, 2015 seeks orders that – 1. That the grant letters of administration made to Kavata Munywoki Kitu on 30 th December, 2013 and certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 15th April, 2015 be revoked. 2. That this Honorable Court be pleased to issue preservatory orders of the estate of the deceased pending the hearing and determination of this application. 2. It is stated in the replying affidavit that the proceedings to obtain the grant were defective in substance. That the grant was obtained fraudulently by the making of false statements and the concealment of material facts to the court. It is further stated that the consent on record is a forgery and the estate of the deceased has not been properly distributed. 3. The application is unopposed. No papers have been filed in opposition to the same. 4. During the hearing of the application the Respondents did not turn up though served. proceeded ex parte. 5. The facts deponed in the affidavit in support therefore remain uncontroverted. as prayed. …………………………… B. THURANIRA JADEN Dated and delivered at Kitui this 24th day of September 2015 The application I allow the application

page 1 of 2

…………………………… B. THURANIRA JADEN JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.