REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 813 OF 2014 TENGO W. MADARA & COMPANY ADVOCATES………….......….APPLICANT VERSUS VECTOR SOLUTIONS LIMITED ………………………………….RESPONDENT RULING By an application dated 8th September 2015 brought under the provisions of Section 51(1) and (2) of the Advocates Act Cap 16 Laws of Kenya, the advocate seeks for judgment for costs as taxed in the sum of kshs 621,793. The application is unopposed. There is no evidence of any challenge to the certificate of taxation dated 19th August 2015 and neither is there challenge as to retainer by way of a reference or otherwise. In the premise, I see no reason why I should not grant the application. Accordingly, I enter judgment in favour of the advocate/applicant against the client/respondent in the sum of kshs 621,793 together with interest at 14 % per annum from the date of taxation until payment in full. A decree to issue to that effect. There shall be no orders as to costs of this application. Orders accordingly. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE 15/10/2015
Original judgment
Tengo W. Madara & Company Advocates v Vector Solutions Limited
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.