Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mwirichia – Deceased Justus Thiora Kiugu & 4 others v Joyce Nkatha Kiugu

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 81 OF 2015 (OS) IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF M'IKIUGU M'MWIRICHIA ALIAS IKUGU MWIRICHIA – DECEASED JUSTUS THIORA KIUGU...........................................1ST PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT DAVID KUBANIA KIUGU.........................................2ND PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT JULIUS KATHURIMA KIUGU..................................3RD PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT AYUB MWITI KIUGU................................................4TH PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT EDWARD MAITETHIA KIUGU................................5TH PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT VERSUS JOYCE NKATHA KIUGU...........................................DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING My ruling dated 12th day of October, 2015 is varied in order to read as follows: Prayer 3 in the application dated 9.10.2015 is granted to the Applicants and the Tenants in Plot No. Meru Municipality Block 11/210 do deposit all the rents/earnings in a joint account in the names of: 1. Justus Thiora Kiugu and the firm of Kiautha Arithi, Advocates. 2. Both parties will be signatories to the account 3. The oral application by the firm of Maitai Rimita & Company Advocates to Cease acting for the plaintiffs is allowed and henceforth the firm of Kiautha Arithi & Co. Advocates will effect service on the plaintiffs personally. 4. The Joint account referred to in order 1 above shall be opened within 14 days. 5. Directions on 11.11.2015. It is so ordered. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 26th day of October, 2015 in the presence of: Cc. Daniel/Lilian All plaintiffs Kiautha Arithi for defendant

page 1 of 2

P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.