Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 1175 of 2015

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL SUIT NO 14 OF 2006 KARUTHU MAGIRI alias MARY MAGIRI (Suing as the administratrix of the estate of M’MAGIRI M’ANAMPIU ................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOHN KABURU MAGIRI ....................................................................1st DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT FUNDS TRUSTEE.......................................................2ND DEFENDANT M’RUTERE M’NGURATHI.................................................................3RD DEFENDANT FLORENCE MUTHONI ABIRA CHARLES .......................................4TH DEFENDANT RULING Parties were issued with a Notice to show cause, Under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, why this suit should not be dismissed. On 12/11/2015, Mr. Dickson Kimathi for the Plaintiff told the Court that his firm had filed an application to cease acting for the Plaintiff dated 30/01/2013. He told the Court that their firm had been directed to serve the application upon their Client, the Plaintiff. However, he said, they have been unable to trace him. Mr. Muthamia told the Court that the suit should be dismissed because of non-prosecution. I find that the parties have shown no cause to the satisfaction of this Court as to why this suit should not be dismissed. This suit is, therefore dismissed. I award no costs as the defendants have not demonstrated their eagerness to have the suit heard expeditiously. It is so ordered. Delivered in open Court at Meru this 12th day of November, 2015 in the presence of: CC: Lilian /Daniel

page 1 of 2

Dickson Kimathi for Plaintiffs Muthamia for Defendants P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.