Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Fridah Kendi v Lawrence Majau Mberia & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 104 OF 2012 FRIDAH KENDI........................................................PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT VERSUS LAWRENCE MAJAU MBERIA......................1ST DEFENDANT/APPLICANT FESTUS KATHENDU......................................2ND DEFENDANT/APPLICANT COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF MERU......................3RD DEFENDANT JUDGMENT The Plaintiff in this suit has filed a notice of withdrawal of Advocates and notice to act in person dated 6th day of November, 2016. The Plaintiff has also filed a notice of withdrawal of her suit also dated 6th November, 2015 . The two notices were brought to the attention of the Court on 09/11/2015. The Plaintiff told the Court that she had served all parties in the suit with her two notices. This position was confirmed by Advocate Muthomi who was holding brief for Carlpeters Mbaabu for the 1st and 2nd Defendants. The second Defendant, himself, confirmed this position and told the Court that the parties had agreed to the withdrawal of the suit by the Plaintiff with no order as to costs. In the Circumstances, this suit is marked withdrawn with no order as to costs. This Court deems this suit as having definitively been heard, determined and settled. The Court further grants an order that inhibitions registered against Land Parcels No. KIIRUA/NAARI/1410, NYAKI/MULANTHANKARI/2294 and ABOTHUGUCHI/KARIENE/ 3595 be removed by the apposite Land Registrar forthwith It is so ordered. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 11th day of November, 2015 in the presence of:Cc. Daniel / Lilian Calrpeters Mbaabu for the defendants Fridah Kendi (plaintiff) - Absent P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.