Kimutai A Ngetich v Esther Chepkoskei Kotutu & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 168 OF 2000 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE ZAKAYO KIMUTAI KOTUT (Deceased). KIMUTAI A NGETICH..........................................................1ST PETITIONER VERSUS ESTHER CHEPKOSKEI KOTUTU....................................2ND PETITIONER DIRECTIONS 1. This matter was coming for judgment on 30th October 2013 on the main issue of distribution of the estate of the deceased Zakayo Kimutai Kotutu. 2. Mr. Kimutai A. Ngetich filed an affidavit of protest on 24th September 2014 as directed by the Court on 1st July 2014. 3. No directions were taken on how the protest was to be heard. The two counsel appearing for the parties agreed by consent to dispose of the matter by way of written submissions. • While highlighting the submissions it was indicated that the property falling for distribution was: i. Kericho/Nyamanga/325 (11) Acres ii. Kericho/Roret/829 (14.2) Acres iii. Kericho/Roret/599 (1.8) Ha. According to Mr. Motanya the two families have no problem with the distribution of No's (ii) & (iii). Both petitioners have presented their different modes of distribution which are not in agreement. • The 2nd petitioner says parcel no (i) was wholly sold to Samwel Kiplangat Kirui while the 1 st petitioner says only 6 out of the 11acres were sold to the said Samuel Kiplangat Kirui. • There is also an issue of the 1st Petitioner wanting compensation, over tea bushes. These are not matters which can be determined through written submissions. • My view is that oral evidence must be led and witnesses cross-examined to assist the Court on how distribution should be done. • I therefore vacate the Orders of 4th June 2015 for the protest to be determined by written

page 1 of 2