Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Veronica Gitiri Nduiga v The Attorney General Kenneth Mucuiyia Ngai

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU HC CC. NO. 193 OF 2015 VERONICA GITIRI NDUIGA..................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL KENNETH MUCUIYIA NGAI .................................................RESPONDENTS RULING The application is brought under sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, section 24 of the Land Registration Act (Act No. 3 of 2012), section 146 of the Public Health Act and all enabling provisions. It is for the exhumation of the following bodies: 1. Lilian Muthoni Nyaga 2. Joshua Waweru Nduiga 3. Ann Wanjiru, all from land parcel No. Ngandori/Kangaru/T.30 and for their re-burial in land parcel No. Gaturi/Weru/712. The application is supported by a supporting affidavit of the applicant and the attached annexes. In her supporting affidavit, the applicant has stated that she is the registered owner of the two above named parcels of land. She also stated that the remains of the deceased persons are her daughter in law (Lilian Muthoni Nyaga), her son (Joshua Waweru Nduiga) and daughter in law (Anna Wanjiru). She has further stated that she sold land parcel No. Ngandori/Kangaru/T.90 to the interested party. According to her, the exhumation of the remains of the three deceased persons and their re-burial on another piece of land is being done in consideration of Aembu traditional customs and practices. Finally she has stated that it will be in the interests of justice that health officials and the police to be involved in the exhumation process. I have considered the affidavit evidence of the applicant. I find that the exhumation and re-burial process is not opposed by the respondent (the Hon Attorney General). It is important to point out that the respondent was not served. I find that this application raises a weighty issue. As a result, it is such that it cannot be resolved on affidavit evidence. Furthermore, the administrators of the estate of the three persons ought to have been joined as respondents. Finally, this is a matter that ought to be resolved through oral evidence and not through

page 1 of 2

affidavit evidence. In the circumstances, I find that the application is fundamentally defective in seeking to resolve the matter through affidavit evidence. And secondly, for omitting to join the administrators of the estates of the deceased persons or other interested parties. In the light of the foregoing, I hereby dismiss this application with no order as to costs. RULING DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in open court at EMBU this 5th day of NOVEMBER .2015 In the absence of all parties. Court clerk Nyaga J.M. BWONWONGA JUDGE 05.11.15

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.