REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT HOMA BAY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 69 OF 2014 BETWEEN DENNIS OKAY ACHIEL……….. …….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………...………….……... RESPONDENT (Appeal from the original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 1651 of 2006 at the Senior Resident Magistrates Court at Homa Bay, Hon. E. K. Mwaita , Ag SRM, dated 4th April 2007) JUDGMENT 1. The appellant was convicted on a total of 10 counts of school breaking and committing a felony contrary to section 306(a) of the Penal Code (Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya). The offences were committed between 23rd and 24th December 2006 at Asumbi Girls Secondary School. The appellant broke into the school and stole several items belonging to the students. 2. He was tried and convicted on all the ten counts and sentenced to seven years imprisonment on all the counts. The learned magistrate ordered that the sentence on count 1 and 2 to run consecutively and those on counts 3 to 10 to run concurrently. The effect of the sentence is the appellant will serve 14 years in prison. 3. The appellant abandoned his appeal on conviction and urged that the sentence was harsh and excessive. Mr Oluoch, counsel for the State, conceded the appeal on the ground that the learned magistrate erred in imposing a concurrent sentence without any reason or explanation. 4. The appellate court is entitled to intervene in a sentence where there is an error of principle. In this case, all the offences were committed on one night and there was no reason given by the learned magistrate to impose consecutive sentences on the 2 counts when the offences proved were as a result of one transaction. 5. In the circumstances, the consecutive sentences for count 1 and 2 are set aside and substituted with concurrent sentences. 6. The appeal succeeds to that extent and since the appellant has served the 7 years imprisonment, he is set free unless otherwise lawfully held. DATED and DELIVERED at HOMA BAY this 17th day of December 2014 D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.