REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION JR CASE NO. 24 OF 2012 REPUBLIC....................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS TOWN CLERK, CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI.......1ST RESPONDENT TEASURER, CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI...........2ND RESPONDENT CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI..............................3RD RESPONDENT EX-PARTE MARY KIRIGO WACHIRA JUDGEMENT The ex-parte Applicant, Mary Kirigo Wachira was involved in a road traffic accident involving motor vehicle registration number KAB 115Q belonging to the 3 rd Respondent, the City Council of Nairobi. The ex-parte Applicant sued the 3rd Respondent and the driver of the motor vehicle for compensation for the injuries sustained in Nairobi CMCC No. 2429 of 2007. Judgement was entered in favour of the exparte Applicant. Demands for payment made upon the 1st Respondent (the Town Clerk) and the 2nd Respondent (the Treasurer) have not yielded any fruits. The ex-parte Applicant through the further amended notice of motion dated 17 th October, 2012 therefore prays for an order of mandamus to compel the respondents to pay the decreed amount. The application is not opposed. An order of mandamus is issued by the High Court to a public body or government official ordering the fulfilment of statutory duties. The ex-parte Applicant has demonstrated that judgement was entered against the 3rd Respondent but the 1st and 2nd respondents have refused to pay the decretal amount. Demand has been made without success. The respondents have a statutory duty to obey a court judgment. The ex-parte Applicant has met the conditions for the grant of an order of mandamus. An order of mandamus will therefore issue as prayed. The respondents are condemned to meet the costs of these proceedings. Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 30th day of October, 2014 W. KORIR, JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.