Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Mbugua (rev) & 1 other v The Hon. Prof. Githu Muigai & 6 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION PETITION NO.447 OF 2013 BETWEEN JOHN MBUGUA (REV)........….........................................1ST PETITIONER WILSON NG'ANG'A KABIRIA...........................2ND PETITIONER AND THE HON. PROF. GITHU MUIGAI.....….........................1ST RESPONDENT THE HON. DR. WILLY MUTUNGA CHIEF JUSTICE & PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA.........................2ND RESPONDENT MR. KERIAKO TOBIKO DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION.............................................................3RD RESPONDENT MR. DAVID KAMAIYO INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE...................................................4TH RESPONDENT DR. EVANS KIDERO GOVERNOR NAIROBI..................5TH RESPONDENT NAIROBI CITY COUNTY...............................................6TH RESPONDENT NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY....................7TH RESPONDENT DIRECTIONS 1. This file has had a chequered history. It has moved from the Environment and Land Division to this Division then to the High Court in Nakuru and back to this Division. The reasons for the said movements include the fact that the pleadings are wobbly and raise cross-cutting issues in terms of place, incident and time. 2. Nonetheless, on 22nd January 2014, Parties agreed to file Submissions on the issue of liability of the Respondents, if at all, and directions were to be given later on whether evidence as to compensation should be tendered. Parties indeed made submissions on 27th March 2014 and I retired to consider that issue.

page 1 of 2

3. Upon carefully reading the file, I noted that the Petitioners raised a plethora of issues that required further interrogation and which in all fairness cannot be addressed through Affidavits and Submissions. To do so and noting that the Petitioners are acting in person and noting the issues raised, may well cause injustice to all parties. 4. In the event, I will recall the orders issued earlier and instead direct as follows; 5. Let this matter be heard by way of oral evidence and a wholesome judgment on all issues arising can thereafter be given. 6. Further, parties may consider whether this is a matter to be heard by one Judge or whether it raises substantial issues of law under Article 165(4) of the Constitution and therefore whether more than one Judge is required. 7. Orders accordingly. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2014 ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE In the presence of: Kariuki – Court clerk Petitioners present Miss Cherono for 7th Respondent Mr. Ojwang for 1st Respondent Miss Nyamrega for 3rd & 4th Respondent Order Directions given. ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE Further Order Oral evidence to be taken on 10/10/2014. ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.