Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 7830 of 2014

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI FAMILY DIVISION MISC. CAUSE NO. 23 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY MICHAEL MUNGAI KIMANI, STEPHEN NJUGUNA KIMANI, ELIUD MBUGUA KIMANI, JOHN CHEGE KIMANI, JAMES WAITITU KIMANI, DENNIS MURIITHI KIMANI AND GEORGE NJOROGE KIMANI IN THE MATTER OF PRESUME OF THE DEATH OF KIMANI GITUANJA RULING 1. The motion dated 17th December 2013 seeks the joinder of the applicant as interested party to the Originating Summons dated 13th February 2012. 2. The said Motion was served on the respondents on 10 th March 2014. There is an affidavit of service on record sworn by one Johnstone Kioko Nzivu on 19 th March 2014, which shows that a copy of the Motion was received at the offices of G.E.O. Oluoch, Advocate, on 10 th March 2014, a signature was affixed and a stamp embossed on the reverse of the copy of the Motion to acknowledge receipt. 3. The respondents have not filed replies to the Motion. I shall therefore treat it as unopposed. 4. I have skimmed through the contents of the application. I am satisfied that the applicant is no doubt sufficiently connected to and interested in the subject of the Originating Summons dated 13 th February 2012. It would be proper to enjoin her as an interested party in those proceedings. 5. Consequently, the application by way of the Notice of Motion dated 17th December 2013 is hereby allowed in the terms proposed by the applicant. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 25th DAY OF April, 2014. W. MUSYOKA JUDGE In the presence of Mr. Musingu advocate for the applicants.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.