REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL CASE NO. 25 OF 2004 PAUL NZOMO MWITIKI ….................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS NDAMBUKI KISONGWE ….......................... 1ST DEFENDANT MARGARET KAVEKE KYENGO ................... 2ND DEFENDANT RULING 1. The application dated 13th November, 2013 by way of Chamber Summons is for leave for the firm of N.O. Sumba and Company Advocates to cease acting for the plaintiff. It also seeks an order that the plaintiff pays costs. 2. It is supported by an affidavit deponed by Nicholas Sumba, Advocate who states that the plaintiff who had retained the firm of N.O. Sumba and Company Advocates as advocates in this matter has withdrawn instructions and instructed the firm of Matata and Company Advocates though they have not filed a notice of change of advocates. 3. Though served with the application the plaintiff failed and or neglected to respond to the application. The respondents/defendants did not oppose the application. In the premises the applicant has demonstrated a case for issuance of the order sought. Consequently, the application is allowed as prayed. 4. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MACHAKOS this 23RD L.N. MUTENDE JUDGE day of JANUARY, 2014.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.