Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Nairobi City Council

IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPL. NO. 103B OF 2013 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............………………………….…………………….. APPLICANT AND NAIROBI CITY COUNCIL ...................................................... RESPONDENT AND LUZIKI HOLDINGS LIMITED ….…......………….. 1ST INTERESTED PARTY ELIZABETH WANJIRA EVANS ………..………. 2ND INTERESTED PARTY MARY WANJIRU GACHEGE ………….……….. 3RD INTERESTED PARTY EXPARTE CHRISTINE WANGARI GACHEGESuing on behalf of the Estate of RAHAB WANJIRU EVANS RULING 1. This case has been brought by Christine Wangari Gachege on behalf of the Estate of Rahab Wanjiru Evans (deceased). According to the grant of letter of administration dated 15 th January 2001, the administrators of the estate are Christine Wangari Gachege, Elizabeth Wanjira Evans, Mary Wanjiru Gachege and Peter Gachigi Njogu who is now deceased. 2. The other administrators have not consented to these proceedings as they have indeed joined them as interested parties opposing the claim. 3. The capacity to agitate any suit on behalf of the estate of the deceased inheres in the administrators duly appointed by the court (See section 79 of the Law of Succession Act (Chapter 160 of the

page 1 of 2

Laws of Kenya)). They act jointly at all times and in the event of a dispute among them, as is apparent in this case, the dispute must be resolved by the court that issued the grant of letters of administration. One administrator out of the others lacks the capacity to bind the estate or any of the administrators or file suit alone on behalf of the estate. 4. In the circumstances, this suit is incompetent, it cannot be sustained. I warn myself that striking out of a suit is a drastic remedy but where there is no capacity of the parties, the axe must fall. 5. The Notice of Motion dated 28th March 2013 must be struck out. It is hereby struck out with costs to the respondent and interested parties. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 22nd day of January 2014 D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.