Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Dickson Oruko Nyawinda v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2014 (From the Judgment and Conviction in Voi Principal Magistrate's Court Criminal Case No. 48 of 2010 – Hon. Wahome - PM) DICKSON ORUKO NYAWINDA ……….……............................…APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …......….............................................................RESPONDENT RULING The Notice of Motion application dated 9th January, 2014 expressed to be brought under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeks for an order to release the appellant pending the hearing and determination of his appeal. The grounds are that the appellant has timeously appealed. That the appeal has overwhelming chances of success and that this was a commercial transaction and the charges should not have arisen. Further that he had been admitted to a bond of Ksh. 50,000/= in the lower court and he had not absconded. This court did not have the advantage of perusing the typed records of the original file but has perused the Judgment and some of the uncertified photocopied proceedings. It is noted that the appellant was sentenced to a short imprisonment term. There is real danger of serving the whole of that term before his appeal can be heard owing to the huge backlog of cases for appeal. It is on those circumstances that the application for bond pending appeal is granted. He is admitted to a bond of Ksh. 250,000/= with one surety of similar amount. Ruling delivered dated and signed this 5th day of February, 2014. …................... M. MUYA

page 1 of 2

JUDGE 5TH FEBRUARY, 2014 In the presence of:Learned State Counsel Mr. Ayodo Learner Defence Counsels Mr. Magolo Court Clerk Mr. Musundi

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Dickson Oruko Nyawinda v Republic — Original judgment | Caselaw