Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Karani Kiberenge (deceased) Represented By Timothy Mugo Karani & 1 other v Minister For Lands

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA JR. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR ORDERS OF PROHIBITION AND CERTIORARI AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL TO THE MINISTER LAND APPEAL CASE NUMBER 125 OF 1991 JOHN KARANI KIBERENGE (DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY TIMOTHY MUGO KARANI ............................................................................... APPELLANT AGAINST ITUGURA MUNYI REPRESENTED BY KITHAKA IKUTHU ....DEFENDANT AND IN THE MATTER OF MUTITU LAND ADJUDICATION SECTION ITUGURA MUNYI REPRESENTED BY KITHAKA IKUTHI ..... APPLICANT VERSUS MINISTER FOR LANDS ...............................................................RESPONDENT AND THE LAND REGISTRAR MBEERE DISTRICT ....................... 1ST INTEREESTED PARTIES JOHN KARANI KIBERENGE (REPRESENTED BY TIMOTHI MUGO KARANI ....................................... 2ND INTERESTED PARTY RULING The applicant herein vide his Chamber summons filed on 14th January 2014 under Certificate of Urgency seeks leave to apply for an order of certiorari to quash the decision of the respondent in

page 1 of 2

Appeal Case No. 125 of 1991 depriving him of his property without reasonable cause. He further seeks leave to apply for an order of prohibition prohibiting the Land Registrar Mbeere District the 1st interested party herein from registering the disputed portions of land and that such leave do operate as a stay of the intended action by the said Land Registrar Mbeere District. The application is supported by the ex-parte applicant’s verifying affidavit and other annextures in which he has deponed, inter alia, that the respondent in his ruling dated 31st July 2013 in Appeal Case No. 125 of 1991 did not give any reasons or grounds for deviating from the ruling of the Committee Case No. 37/74-75. I have considered the application, the submission by Kamunda advocate, the applicant’s verifying affidavit and Statutory statement as well as the annextures herein. I am satisfied from the material placed before me that ex-parte applicant has established sufficient reasons to warrant the granting of the orders sought in the said Chamber Summons. I grant the leave sought and further direct that the said leave shall operate as a stay of the decision of the said Land Registrar Mbeere District from registering the disputed portions of land to the 2 nd interested party pending the hearing and determination of the substantive Notice of Motion which shall be filed within twenty one (21) days of the delivery of this ruling. I further direct that the said Notice of Motion be served on all persons/parties affected by it within 14 days of being filed. Costs in the cause. B.N. OLAO JUDGE 31ST JANUARY, 2014 31/01/2014 Coram B.N. Olao – Judge CC – Mwangi Mr. Ngari for Mr. Kamunda for Applicant - present Respondent - absent (Ex-parte) COURT: Ruling delivered in open Court this 31st January 2014. Mr. Ngari for Mr. Kamunda for applicant present. B.N. OLAO JUDGE 31ST JANUARY, 2014

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.