Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Review Order of Certiorari v The District Commissioner Igembe Central District

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU JUDICIAL REVIEW NO. 16 OF 2011 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY SAMWEL KUBAI M'ITHIRIA FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDER OF CERTIORARI AND IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND ADJUDICATION ACT CAP 284 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF KIENGU/KANJOO LAND PARCEL NUMBER 756 SAMWEL KUBAI M'ITHIRIA................................................................................................................................APPLICAN T VERSUS THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER IGEMBE CENTRAL DISTRICT...................................................................RESPONDENT AND AWA KAMOTHO MUSA............................................................................................................................INTERESTED PARTY RULING This application is dated 17.10.2013 and seeks orders: 1. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to join the applicant as a party herein to substitute the Applicant who is now deceased. 2. THAT costs of this application be in the cause. When the application came up for interpartes hearing on 27.3.2014 it was unopposed. Mr. Kieti, for A.G., for the respondent, urged the court to allow the application with costs being in the cause. In the circumstances, the application is allowed with costs to be in the cause. Delivered in open court at Meru this 27th day of March, 2014 in the presence of:

page 1 of 2

Cc Daniel Otieno h/b H. Gitonga for the Applicant Kieti for Respondent P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.