Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joseph M'ethara & 1 other v 1. District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Tigania West & 7 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU PETITION NO. 182 OF 2011 IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS QUARANTEED THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA BETWEEN JOSEPH M'ETHARA..................................................................1ST PETITIONER SILAS KIREA M'ETHARA...........................................................2ND PETITIONER AND 1. DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER TIGANIA WEST.......................................................1ST RESPONDENT 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL.........................................................2ND RESPONDENT 3. MUNGANIA MWITARI..........................................................3RD RESPONDENT 4. M'KUBANIA KIUGA..............................................................4TH RESPONDENT 5. JACOB KIMATHI.................................................................5TH RESPONDENT 6. FRANCIS KUBANIA.............................................................6TH RESPONDENT 7. SHADRACK KANAMPIU......................................................7TH RESPONDENT 8. BERNARD GATIMBA...........................................................8TH RESPONDENT RULING This application is dated 14th February, 2014. It seeks orders: (a) THAT this court be pleased to certifiy this matter as urgent and have it heard exparte in the first instance.

page 1 of 2

(b) THAT, this honourable court be pleased to issue preservatory orders against the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th 7th, and 8th defendants in terms of an order of temporary injunction by themselves, their agents, assignees or anybody acting on their behest from, entering, interfering with the plaintiffs quiet possession, evicting, changing the registration status of the subject parcels and or restraining the defendants from carrying on fresh survey of a road of access till this mater is heard and determined interparties (c) THAT, this honourable court be pleased to issue presevatory orders against the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th defendants/respondents in terms of an order of temporary injunction by themselves, their agents, assignees, or anybody acting on their behest from entering, interfering with the plaintiffs' quiet possession, evicting, changing the registration status of the subject parcels and or restraining the defendants from carrying on the survey of road of access till this petition is heard and determined. (d) THAT, this honourable court be pleased to issue a penal warning to the respondents in case of disobedience in the following terms;“That if you, the respondents herein by yourselves, your agents, assigneees, servant or people acting at your behest do not obey this lawful court order, you will be cited for contempt of court an offence that is punishable by 6 months imprisonment or a fine or both”. (e) THAT, costs of this application be borne by the respondents. Prayers (a), (b) and (d) are spent. The defendants were served but did not come to court on 4.3.2014 for the hearing of this application interpartes. In the circumstances, the application is allowed. Costs shall be in the cause. Delivered in open court this 4th day of March, 2014 in the presence of: Cc. Daniel Ondari for petitioners/applicants P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.