REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL NO.184 OF 2011 SAMUEL OGODO WAGA ….................................................APPLICANT VERSUS FISH PROCESSORS [2000] LIMITED....................................RESPONDENT [Being an appeal from the ruling of R. B. N MALOBA – R.M. from the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kisumu in CMCC No.257 of 2011.] ************** RULING The applicant has appealed to the Court of Appeal against the decision of this court which on 31/10/12 dismissed with costs his application under Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules for the review of the judgment dated 26/7/12. What is being appealed against is a negative order. Further, it is now trite that where what is sought to be stayed is the order for costs, the same cannot be granted as the appellant, if he succeeds in the appeal, would be refunded his costs. (FRANCIS KABAA .V. NANCY WAMBUI & ANOTHER, Civil Application No. NAI 298 OF 1996). The application is misconceived and is dismissed with costs. Dated, signed and delivered this 13th March, 2014 A. O. MUCHELULE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.