Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Section 118a Evidence Act Cap. 80 Laws of Kenya Joyce Wanjiru v David Kariuki Waweru

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU MISC. APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 118A EVIDENCE ACT CAP. 80 LAWS OF KENYA JOYCE WANJIRU …………………………...…….....APPLICANT VERSUS DAVID KARIUKI WAWERU ………………………RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. The applicant herein applied for David Kariuki Waweru to be presumed dead. She testified that he has not been seen or heard from him since 1982, a period of 31 years. She stated that she was registered in 1975 as joint proprietor with him of GATURI/GITHIMU/2434. She avers that the respondent was friend of her husband, Stanley Warua Kanyonyo, who passed away in 1992. 2. The Chief Embu Municipality location has confirmed that respondent was last seen in Dallas/Stadium Sub-location in 1982 and he has tried to locate his whereabouts without any success. 3. This suit was also advertised in the Standard newspaper on 1 st April 2014 and no response has been forthcoming. The applicant testified that she has constructed a permanent building on the land which the respondent is a co-owner. In all probability he would have or those close to him would have laid claim to the land or inquired about the building. 4. I am satisfied that the same David Kariuki Waweru has not been seen or heard from by persons who would have been in association with him or known him. I therefore declare that David Kariuki Waweru, the joint owner of GATURI/GITHIMU/2434, shall be presumed dead from the date of this judgment. DATED AND DELIVERED AT EMBU THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2014 D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.