Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Abdi Karah Makarasa v Loldia Limited

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CIVIL APPEAL NO.7 OF 2011 ABDI KARAH MAKARASA ....................... APPELLANT VERSUS LOLDIA LIMITED ................................. RESPONDENT RULING On 14/01/2011, the appellant filed a memorandum of appeal dated 13 th January 2011. By 11th may, the original record from the lower court was received by the Nakuru High Court Deputy Registrar. Thereafter, no other steps have been taken by the appellant and on 3 rd February 2014, this court issued a notice to both parties’ counsel to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed under Order 42 Rule 35 (2) Civil Procedure Rules. The Rule provides that: Order 42 Rule 35(2) “If, within one year after the service of the memorandum of appeal, the appeal shall not have been set down for hearing, the Registrar shall on notice to the parties list the appeal before a judge in chambers for dismissal.” There has been no activity in this matter for three years now and appellant having failed to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, I hold the view that the appellant has lost interest in this matter, and it does not warrant another day’s life in court. The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent. Delivered and dated this 16th day of May, 2014 at Nakuru. H.A. OMONDI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.