Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Akitch Okola v The Inspect General of Police Francis Kimaiyo

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CONSTITUTIONAL DIVISION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 183 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 8 & 9OF THE LAW REFORM ACT CAP 26 AND IN THE MATTER OF ORDER 53 OF THE CIVIL PROCEURE RULES, 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TRAFFIC ACT, CAP 403 OF THE LAW OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTTER OF THE TRAFFIC RULES, 1953 BETWEEN AKITCH OKOLA....................................................................................APPLICANT AND THE INSPECT GENERAL OF POLICE FRANCIS KIMAIYO……..RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have listened to learned counsel for the Applicant and I have perused the application dated 16th May 2014. 2. The Applicant alleges that the decision by the Respondent to bar private vehicles from having tinted windows is not supported by the law and hence amounts to an amendment of the Traffic Rules, a power which the Respondent does not have. 3. That issue in my view establishes a prima facie case which warrants the grant of leave sought. 4. Accordingly, I grant leave in terms of prayers 2(a) and 2(b) of the Chambers Summons dated 16th May 2014 and direct that the substantive Motion be filed and served within 3 days.

page 1 of 2

5. The applicant also seeks a direction that the grant of leave, do operate as a stay of the said directive. Whereas the Respondent may well show at the hearing that the said directive is well intended the fact that his powers to issue the same are under challenge ought to be investigated. Since it is contended that so far the said directive is only being used to harass motorists, I am satisfied that the same ought to be stayed for the limited period of hearing and determining the Notice of Motion. 6. Accordingly I direct that the grant of leave shall operate as a stay of the said directive pending the hearing and determination of the substantive Motion or until further orders of the Court. 7. However as it is admitted that the said directive is only unlawful in so far as it relates to private vehicles, this order will not apply to public service vehicles. 8. Directions on 29th May, 2014. Costs in the cause. Dated at Nairobi this 20th day of May 2014 G V ODUNGA JUDGE Delivered in the presence of: Mr Change for the Applicant Cc Kevin

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.