Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 4315 of 2014

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 4 OF 2013 REPUBLIC VERSUS MICHAEL MWAURA MBUU ………………………….. APPLICANT RULING ON REVISION 1. Vide letter dated 231/2013, the Director of Public Prosecutions through the prosecution counsel, Mukofu Naylor appealed to this court to invoke section 362 and section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code and revise the orders made on 15/1/2013 by Hon. E. Too RM in CMCr. 2404/2011. 2. I have perused the said record of the lower court and note that on the date complained about, there was no prosecutor in court by 10.20 a.m. The prosecution was allowed their last adjournment in the previous court session. On the date complained about, the trial magistrate stated inter-alia, as follows:“Court orders are not made in vain and therefore in the absence of the prosecutor in court, I close the prosecution case.” 3. Section 362 and section 364 generally give the High Court the powers of revision. 4. In a criminal trial, the prosecutor should be in court. In this case, at 10.20 a.m. there was no prosecutor in court and in the absence of any explanation, the trial magistrate deemed the prosecution case as closed. No court should be held at ransom by the prosecution. As stated in Hosea Waweru & 2 Others –vs- Republic (2012) e KLR:“The court before which any case is being hard has the right authority and obligation to control the proceedings before it.” 5. There is therefore nothing in this matter to be revised. Consequently, I dismiss the application for revision. ……………………………………… B. THURANIRA JADEN JUDGE Dated and delivered at Machakos this 16th day of June 2014. ……………………………………… B. THURANIRA JADEN JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.