Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Ibrahim Dahir Noor

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARISSA CRIMINAL CASE NO. 9 OF 2014 REPUBLIC……………………………………………………………………PROSECUTOR VERSUS IBRAHIM DAHIR NOOR……………………………………………………………ACCUSED RULING This is a ruling on bail application by the accused. He seeks to be released on bail/bond on reasonable conditions pending the hearing and determination of this case. The application came by way of Notice of Motion dated 28th May 2014 and filed on the same date. The application is supported by the affidavit sworn and filed on the same date. The accused is described as an officer working with the Prisons Department and based at the Garissa G.K Prison. He is said to reside with his family within the Garissa G.K Prisons’ compound. In addition to being a prisons warder, the accused is said to be the Islamic Spiritual Welfare Officer within Prisons. The application was not opposed by the learned state counsel who also confirmed that the accused is working with Prisons Department. I have considered this application and the grounds supporting the same. I have also considered that the application is not opposed. I will and do hereby allow the same and set the bond/bail terms as follows: a. The accused shall be released on bond of two million shillings (Kshs 2,000,000) with one surety of similar amount. b. In the alternative the accused is released on a cash bail of one million shillings (Kshs 1,000,000) to be deposited with the Registrar of the Court until this case is heard and determined. It is so ordered. Dated, signed and delivered this 5th day of June 2014. S.N.MUTUKU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.