REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ORDERS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND RICE HOLDING NO. 3435 UNIT W 4 WAMUMU SECTION OF THE NATIONAL IRRIGATION BOARD – MWEA IRRIGATION SETTLEMENT SCHEME AND IN THE MATTER OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS DATED 20TH MARCH 2014 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................... APPLICANT VERSUS NATIONAL IRRIGATION BOARD ............................................. RESPONDENT AND 1. JOHN WAWERU .................................................................................... ) 2. MARGARET MUTHONI .................................) INTERESTED PARTIES 3. ELIZABETH MUTHONI ....................................................................... ) EX-PARTE .............. JOHN GICHOBI KARUGUMI ALIAS KARABA KARUGUMI RULING By his ex-parte Chamber Summons dated 9th May 2014 and filed herein on 12 th May 2014, the exparte applicant seeks the following orders:1. That the ex-parte be grated leave to bring an application for certiorari to bring and quash the proceedings and award of the Sub-Advisory Committee of the National Irrigation Board – Mwea Irrigation Settlement Scheme dated 20 th March 2014 in respect of rice holding No. 3435 Unit 4 Wamumu Section originally allotted to Karugumi Nyaga – deceased 2. That the ex-parte applicant be granted leave to apply for prohibitory and mandamus orders against the Senior Scheme Manager National Irrigation Board – Mwea Irrigation Settlement Scheme stopping him from allocating the rice holding No. 3435 Unit 4 Wamumu Section of the Mwea Irrigation Settlement Scheme and such allocation, if any, be declared null and void AND the manager be compelled to have the rice holding in issue allocated to the ex-parte applicant in full compliance of Regulation 7(2) of the Irrigation (National Irrigation Schemes) Regulation made pursuant to Section 27 of the Irrigation Act Chapter 347 laws of Kenya. 3. That the leave granted above do operate as a stay of execution and further proceedings
page 1 of 3
respectively 4. That costs of this application be in the cause. The said application was premised on the grounds stated therein and also on the annexed affidavit of the Ex-parte applicant JOHN GICHOBI KARUGUMI alias KARABA KARUGUMI. The same was argued by Mr. Kahigah advocate. I have considered the application, the supporting affidavit together with the annextures thereto and the submissions of Mr. Kahigah the applicant’s advocate. From the material placed before me, it is clear that the ex-parte applicant’s father one KARUGUMI NYAGA (deceased) was the registered licencee of rice holding No. 3435 Wamumu Section Unit 4. Prior to his death, the deceased had written to the National Irrigation Board (the respondent herein) appointing the ex-parte applicant to succeed him as a licencee of the said rice holding. This was done pursuant to the provisions of Rule 7(1) of the Irrigation (National Irrigation Schemes) Regulations which empowers a licencee to nominate a successor during his lifetime to succeed him upon death. In breach of that provision, the respondent herein refused to grant the successorship of the rice-holding to the ex-parte applicant but instead awarded the same to the interested parties herein following a meeting held on 20th March 2014 to which the ex-parte applicant was not even invited nor was he afforded the right to be heard. Hence this application. On the face of it, I am satisfied that the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for the orders sought in this Chamber Summons. I accordingly allow the same and grant the leave sought. In accordance with Order 53 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, I direct that the applicant do file the Notice of Motion within 21 days from the date of this ruling and serve the same upon the respondent, the interested parties and all other such persons as are affected by it within 14 days of filing and thereafter file an affidavit indicating who has been served. I further direct that the leave granted herein shall operate as a stay of execution of the orders of the respondent’s sub-Advisory Committee dated 20th March 2014. The costs shall be in the cause. B.N. OLAO JUDGE 27TH JUNE, 2014 27/6/2014 Before B.N. Olao – Judge Mwangi - CC Mr. Gachau for Kahiga for Applicant – present COURT: Ruling delivered this 27th June 2014 in open Court. Mr. Gachau for Kahiga for Applicant present. B.N. OLAO
page 2 of 3
JUDGE 27TH JUNE, 2014
page 3 of 3