Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ngome Natala v 1. Buleti Ngaira 2. Rachel Ngaira 3. Shiro Ngaira 4. Gladys Machuma Musotsi 5. Mulupi Buleti 6. Philip Buleti & 5 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA CIVIL CASE NO. 10 OF 2011 NGOME NATALA …........................................ PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1. BULETI NGAIRA 2. RACHEL NGAIRA 3. SHIRO NGAIRA 4. GLADYS MACHUMA MUSOTSI 5. MULUPI BULETI 6. PHILIP BULETI................................................DEFENDANTS 7. CHARLES BULETI 8. RUTH INJETE 9. HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR REGISTRAR OF LANDS KAKAMEGA 10. REUBEN CHIBOLE AND WEST KENYA SUGAR CO. LTD. ………... INTERESTED PARTY RULING Before me is an application dated 8th August 2013 brought by the plaintiff by way of Notice of Motion seeking interim injunctive orders pending the hearing of the suit. The application was brought under Order 40 rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 63 (e) of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap. 21). On the hearing date Mr. Ondieki for the plaintiff, Mr. Amasakha for the 1st to 8 and 10th defendants,

page 1 of 2

and Mr. Onyiso for the 9th defendant appeared in court. Mr. Ondieki for the plaintiff stated that the application did not affect the 9th defendant. Mr. Amasakha for the 1st to 8 and 10th defendants stated that the interim orders already in place could continue to be in force. In effect, the application is not opposed. Consequently, I allow the application and grant prayer 3 and 4. The costs of the application will be in the cause, as the main case is still pending. Dated and delivered at Kakamega this 12th day of June, 2014 George Dulu JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.