Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 3538 of 2014

NO. 357/2014 REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 6 OF 2013 IN THE MATTER OF BABY A K ON APPLICATION FOR AN ADOPTION ORDER ORIGINATING SUMMONS (Under Section 154, 156, 157, 159, 160, 162 & 163 of the Children’s Act (2001) BY J N K……………….……….1ST APPLICANT J M N ……………………. 2ND APPLICANT RULING 1. The applicants herein by an Originating Summons dated 14 th December, 2012 seek to adopt Baby A K. B M K was appointed as the child’s guardian ad litem on the 10th June, 2014. R M M on the other hand has consented to be the legal guardian of the child. 2. I have considered the application and in particular affidavits and documents in support of the application. Baby A who is said to have been born on the 27th September 2009 was abandoned and found by one S M K. He was committed to the African Gospel Church and consequently placed in custody of the applicants on the 21st June 2012. 3. A certificate of being free for adoption No. 727 was issued by the Kenya Children’s Home Adoption Society on the 3rd September, 2011. 4. The report filed by the District Children’s Officer is in favour of the child being adopted. It was observed that the applicants possess social abilities considered important to that of taking up parental responsibilities. 5. In the result I do order as follows: i. The applicants are authorized to adopt Baby A K who will be known as A K N. ii. The child shall be declared a Kenyan Citizen. iii. R M M is appointed as the legal guardian of the child. iv. The Registrar General shall make an entry in the Register in the manner prescribed

page 1 of 2

DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MACHAKOS this 24TH day L.N. MUTENDE JUDGE of JULY, 2014.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.