Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 3254 of 2014

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 24 OF 2014 ANNE WAMBUI KARIUKI.......................................APPLICANT VERSUS RESPONDENT..........................................................REPUBLIC (From the order in Criminal case Number 2684 of 2013 in the Chief Magistrate’s court at Kibera) RULING The applicant Ann Wambui Kariuki has been charged in the lower court with the offence of forgery contrary to Section 349 of the Penal Code. The genesis of the charge is a sale agreement said to be between the applicant and her brother over a parcel of land. A report prepared by a document examiner has been presented to the applicant’s counsel which implicates her. By a letter dated 24th March, 2014 the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the evidence so far adduced is contradictory and that the documents should be released to the applicant to enable her engage an independent document examiner and a report prepared to aid her defence. An application made before the learned trial magistrate to that effect was denied. This is grounded on Article 50 (2) of the Constitution which provides that every accused person has the right to a fair trial which includes the right(c) To have adequate time and facilities to prepare a defence. (k) To adduce and challenge evidence. It is submitted that the failure by the learned trial magistrate to allow the accused’s document examiner access to the documents is not only prejudicial but would infringe on her constitutional rights. It is the duty of the courts to give effect to the tenor, context and spirit of the Constitution. With respect therefore, the learned trial magistrate should have acceded to the applicant’s application aforesaid. The learned counsel for the Republic concedes the request by the applicant and therefore the order by the learned trial magistrate declining to release the exhibits to a document examiner of the accused’s choice is hereby set aside. The original file now shall be returned to the learned trial magistrate with directions that certified copies of the documents in question shall be released to the applicant for her document examiner to prepare a report within 14 days of the handing over of those documents. Thereafter the trial shall proceed expeditiously. Orders accordingly. SIGNED DATED and DELIVERED in court this 17th day of July, 2014.

page 1 of 2

A.MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.