Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samuel Kinyanjui & 2 others v Geoffrey Richu

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.673 OF 1990 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH GITAU RICHO (DECEASED) SAMUEL KINYANJUI................................................................1ST APPLICANT EDWARD NDUNGU.....................................................................2NDAPLICANT PETER KIAMBUTHI..................................................................3RDAPPLICANT VERSUS GEOFFREY RICHU.....................................................................RESPONDENT RULING The Respondent, with the consent of all the dependants of the estate of the deceased, petitioned the court to be issued with a grant of letters of administration intestate. The grant was issued to him on 7 th August 1990. The grant was confirmed on 15th November 1991. In the certificate of confirmation of grant, the court adopted the Respondent’s proposal in regard to how he intended to distribute the properties that comprised the estate of the deceased to the beneficiaries. A dispute has arisen between the dependants in regard to how a parcel of land registered as LR. No.Dagoretti/Kinoo/600 is to be distributed on the ground. The Respondent made a proposal which has been objected to by the Applicants. On this court’s evaluation of the disagreement, it became apparent that the actual dispute is the position on the ground that each beneficiary is required to get. Part of the dispute is related to the question of access of the various subdivided portions to the main road. This court is of the view that to resolve the dispute once and for all, the parties herein are ordered to each provide two names of surveyors whom they desire to prepare a draft subdivision plan which shall be approved by the court. Out of the names of the surveyors provided, the court shall nominate two (2) surveyors who shall jointly prepare a draft subdivision plan. During the preparation of the draft subdivision plan, all the parties will be required to be on site. If there shall be any disagreement, the same shall be noted by the surveyors who shall present such complaint to court for determination. The names of the proposed surveyors shall exclude the surveyors who previously surveyed the suit parcel of land. The appointed surveyors will be required to hand in a report together with a draft subdivision plan within thirty (30) days of their appointment by the court. The costs of the two (2) surveyors shall be borne equally by all the dependants. The matter shall be mentioned before a Judge in the Family Division thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this Ruling to enable that court appoint the two surveyors. There shall be no orders as to costs. It is so ordered. DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014 L. KIMARU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Samuel Kinyanjui & 2 others v Geoffrey Richu — Original judgment | Caselaw