REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU E & L CASE NO. 15 OF 2014 HASSAN MOHAMED HAJI...........................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MOHAMED KEYNAN HASSAN.......................................................1ST DEFENDANT SIYAD MUSE JIROW........................................................................2ND DEFENDANT RULING On 1.7.2014 the advocates for the plaintiff and defendants presented a consent and moved the court to have its contents adopted as orders of this Court. The consent was in the following terms: “1. The 1st Defendant's/Applicant's application dated 24.6.2014 filed in Meru – ELC No.15 of 2014 be and is hereby allowed with costs in the cause. 2. The 1st Defendant's statement of defence dated 3.3.2014 and filed in court on 24.3.2014 be and is hereby deemed as properly filed. 3. Meru - ELC No. 15 of 2014 and Meru ELC No.91 of 2014 be and are hereby consolidated and to proceed to full hearing upon further directions of the court.” The terms of the Consent are hereby adopted as orders of this Court. It is so ordered. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 1st day of July, 2014 in the presence of: Lilian/Daniel J. M. Karumba for plaintiff J. Otieno for defendant P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE
Original judgment
Hassan Mohamed Haji v Mohamed Keynan Hassan & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.