REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU E AND L CASE NO. 34 OF 2013 SAMUEL GITONGA MATHIU.................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS STANELY KARINGURI IMATHIU..................................1ST DEFENDANT DAVID MUNG'ORI IMATHIU......................................2ND DEFENDANT RULING During directions on 8.7.2014, Mr. Mutunga holding brief for Mr. Mwirigi told the Court that the parties had filed a consent on 7.5.2014 the contents of which they wanted adopted as its order. Mr. Kiambi holding brief for Mr. Kirima for the defendant supported Mr. Mutunga's assertion. The consent signed by the parties advocates reads:“By consent of the Advocate for the plaintiff and for the defendants respectively, the suit herein be transferred to Tigania Law Courts for and determination.” hearing The consent terms are adopted as an order of this Court. Consequently, this suit is transferred to Tigania Law courts for hearing and determination by a magistrate who possesses requisite pecuniary jurisdiction. It is so ordered. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 8th day of July, 2014 in the presence of: Cc. Lilian Mutunga h/b Mwirigi for plaintiff Kiambi h/b Kirima for defendants P. M. MNJOROGE JUDGE
Original judgment
Samuel Gitonga Mathiu v Stanely Karinguri Imathiu & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.