Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2328 of 2014

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL &ADMIRALTY DIVISION HCC NO. 51 OF 2008 PROTON MOTORS CC...........................………PLAINTIFF -VSHENRY N. KHAEMBA ............................1ST DEFENDANT HUSSEIN DADO......................................2nd DEFENDANT RULING 1. The Notice of Motion application before the court is dated 20th May 2013. The application is filed Under Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 19 Rule 1 & 2 (1), Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010, and all other enabling provisions of the law. 2. The application seeks the following Orders; a. That the Plaintiff be granted leave to have the Affidavit of POOVENTHRAN MOODLEY annexed to the Affidavit sworn in support of this application, admitted in evidence and read at the hearing. b. That the costs of this application be in the cause. 3. The application is supported by Affidavit of Mr. POOVENTHRAN MOODLEY witnessed in WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA on 20th May 2013 with annextures and further premised on the grounds stated therein. 4. The application is not opposed but there is no evidence on record that the same was served upon the Respondents. Neither is there an affidavit of service to confirm that it was served. 5. The main reasons for the application is that the said MR. POOVENTHRAN MOODLEY is the Managing Director of the Plaintiff’s company and is the Plaintiff’s principal witness in this suit. The witness resides in WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA and it would be unreasonably expensive for the Plaintiff to facilitate the personal attendance of the witness. Further, it is submitted that the witness is also suffering from ill health with a heart problem and is on chronic medication and has been advised by his Doctor against travelling to Kenya. The travel costs is said to be in the region of USD 11,500.00 which is said to be unreasonable. 6. The applicants Affidavit was sworn before a Notary Public in WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA and was properly authenticated by the Registrar of the High Court of Namibia. 7. The application is also supported by a report by DR. P. VERBURGE who confirms that the witness is not fit to travel to Kenya.

page 1 of 2

8. On the above grounds I am satisfied that the application has merits the grant, and subject to proof before me that the application was served, I allow it as prayed. Orders accordingly. Dated, Read and Delivered at NAIROBI this 26th Day of September 2014. E.K.O OGOLA JUDGE PRESENT: Ogunde for Applicant Absent for Defendant Teresia – Court clerk

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.