Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

(o.s.) v K U S & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 186 OF 2014 (O.S.) AND IN THE MATTER OF CHILDREN’S ACT, No. 8 of 2001 AND IN THE MATTER OF BABY A.M. B E L S ……………………………………1ST APPLICANT AND K U S ……………………………………2ND APPLICANT JUDGMENT 1. The applicants, B E L S and K U S are of Swedish origin and in a monogamous marriage which was solemnized at the Registrar of Marriages, Uppsala City Hall on 16 th January 2000. They have no child of their own. They have brought a Chamber Summons dated 25 th July 2014 seeking permission to adopt the baby A M, an infant of male sex. He was presumed to have been born on 20th November 2012. B E L S is a Systems Developer with [particulars withheld] University, while K U S is a Senior Analyst with [particulars withheld]. They reside in Sunne, Sweden and profess the Christian faith. 2. The child was abandoned by unknown person on 8 th January 2013 at Eve Petrol Station, Ngurubani. He was rescued by two good Samaritans one A K N and his wife E G. 3. The matter was reported to Wanguru Police Station and booked vide Occurrence Book No. 17/7/12/2012. He was later released to New Life Home Trust, Nyeri and later transferred to New Life Home Trust, Nairobi on 17th May 2013. He was committed by the Nairobi Children’s Court through case No. 72 of 2012 to the custody of the said Children’s Home on 20 th December 2012 pending formal adoption proceedings. 4. The child was released into the custody of the Applicants for mandatory foster care pending adoption, pursuant to a foster care agreement signed on 25 th April 2014. Since then the child has been in the continuous custody and care of the Applicants. 5. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, New Life Home Trust, Nairobi, an adoption Society prepared and filed a report in court. A certificate dated 4th December 2013 declaring the child free for adoption was issued by Little Angels Network. The Director of Children’s Services also filed a

page 1 of 2

report dated 3rd September 2014 as did the guardian ad litem, M/s. F D A O. Both reports were favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicants. 6. According to the letter dated 11th August 2008 from the Swedish Migration Board, a Kenyan adoption would be recognised in Sweden and further, adoptions performed in accordance with the Hague Convention are automatically valid in Sweden. 7. From the foregoing I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for an international adoption have been met, and consequently I will make the following orders: a) That the Applicants, B E L S and K U S, are hereby allowed to adopt the child, Baby A M, who shall be hereinafter known as A O L S; b) That E K M L and O M L are hereby appointed the legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicants; c) That the Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the Adoption Register; d) That the child is presumed to be Kenyan by birth. e) That the Director of Immigration is hereby authorised to issue the child with a Kenyan passport. It is so ordered. SIGNED DATED and DELIVERED in open court this 31st day of October 2014. ……………………………………. L. A. ACHODE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.