REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MITHANGA KURIA alias MUTHANGA KURIA alias NJOROGE KURIA (DECEASED) PETER KARIUKI NJOROGE................................................APPLICANT VERSUS HANNAH NDUTA NJUGUNA..........................................RESPONDENT RULING This court has considered the application for review that has been brought by the Applicant. In the opinion of this court, the Applicant has not laid sufficient or any grounds for the court to review its decision. There are no new facts or evidence that were not before the court at the time it made its decision; there is no error apparent on the face of the record that can be rectified by this court granting the application for review. The Applicant has not placed any compelling reason that would move or make the court review and set aside its decision rendered on 25 th July 2014. It appears to the court that the Applicant is laboring under misapprehension of the law hence his decision to file the application. This court will however grant him leave to appeal against the decision of this court to the Court of Appeal. In the premises therefore, the application for review lacks merit and is hereby dismissed with costs. DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014. L. KIMARU JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.