Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Ben Kipyegon Birir

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 72 OF 2008 REPUBLIC........................................................................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS BEN KIPYEGON BIRIR.............................................................................ACCUSED RULING At the end of the prosecutions case, counsel for the accused submitted that the Prosecution had not established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. The Prosecuting Counsel submitted to the contrary. I have now had the benefit of perusing the record and I am satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused. I therefore put the accused to his defence. I remind him of his constitutional and statutory rights 1. to give evidence on oath and be cross-examined, and to call witnesses, 2. to give an unsworn statement and be not subject to cross- examination, 3. to remain silent. The accused is called upon to elect any of these rights through his Advocate. Dated, signed and delivered at Nakuru this 10th day of October, 2014 M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.