Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

The Chairman Gichugu East Dlt & 2 others v Elizabeth Wawira Njagi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO APPLY FOR AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI AND IN HTE MATTER OF DECISION BY THE CHAIRMAN GICHUGU EAST DISTRICT LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL NO. 37. OF 2009 AWARD NO. 1 OF 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND IN THE MATTER OF THE REPUBLIC THE CHAIRMAN GICHUGU EAST DLT..........................................................1S RESPONDENT SRM GICHUGU..............................................................2ND RESPONDENT GRACE KATHUNGU NJERU...........................................3RD RESPONDENT EXPARTE JAMES NJERU MBUNGU.......................................APPLICANT(DECEASED) AND ELIZABETH WAWIRA NJAGI..............................................................APPLICANT RULING This is an application for substitution of a party dated 19/5/2014 brought by way of notice of motion. The applicant Elizabeth Wawira Njagi applies to be substituted in this matter with the deceased James Njeru Njagi Mbungu who is the Exparte Applicant herein. She was represented by Rose W. Njeru & Co. Advocates. The Application is supported by the affidavit of the applicant. Ms. Njeru argued that the Exparte applicant sought to quash orders of the Land Disputes Tribunal in this matter. He is now deceased before the matter was disposed of. The applicant is one of the administrators in the estate of her deceased husband in Kerugoya Succession Cause No. 72 of 2012. The land parcels

page 1 of 2

which are subject of this matter cannot be distributed in the succession cause until this matter is disposed of. The applicant therefore wishes to step in the shoes of her deceased husband in order to prosecute the suit. The respondent filed a replying affidavit in which she states that she is the deceased's eldest widow and for that reason she is the right person to be substituted in this matter. She confirms that there is a succession cause pending in Kerugoya High Court in respect of her deceased husband where the applicant and respondent's two daughters are the joint administrators. I have carefully considered the arguments of both parties in this application. Both parties admit that this matter is still pending where their husband was the exparte applicant. The matter requires to be disposed of in order to give way for the pending succession cause in Kerugoya. The fear of the respondent is that her co-widow may have advantage in way of inheritance over her if she is allowed to substitute the deceased. This court appreciates the fact that the two ladies have already filed the succession cause and the the interests of each house is protected by the administrators who are draw from each of the two houses of the deceased. The respondent need not worry about her interests in inheritance. This matter which has been pending the year 2010 has nothing to do with distribution of deceased's property. The distribution will be done in the Kerugoya succession cause. The applicant has given sound reasons for applying to be substituted in place of her husband in this matter. Being one of the administrators in the succession cause, she has the legal capacity to take over this matter. I find the opposition by the respondent without any legal or factual basis. I therefore allow the application as prayed. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014. F. MUCHEMI JUDGE In the presence of:Mr. Momanyi for Mr. Kagio for Respondent Applicant F. MUCHEMI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.