Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joseph Kipkemboi Rob & 4 others v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2014 JOSEPH KIPKEMBOI ROB................................................1ST APPELLANT JOEL KIPTOO ROB............................................................2ND APPELLANT DAVID KIMELI ROB............................................................3RD APPELLANT JOEL KIPLANGAT ROB......................................................4TH APPELLANT MUSA KIBET ROB...............................................................5TH APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..................................................................................RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 106 of 2013 in the Senior Resident Magistrate's court at Tamu) JUDGMENT The appellants were charged with the offence of trespass contrary to section 3 (1) as read with section 11 of the Trespass Act Chapter 294 Laws of Kenya. They were accused of trespassing into land parcel No. Kisumu/Fort Tenan 68/455 owned by one Joseph Aluoch Agenga. They were then sentenced to 30 days imprisonment without any option of fine hence this appeal. During the hearing of the appeal, counsel for the appellants abandoned the rest of the grounds and limited himself to the last ground namely that the sentence was harsh in the circumstances and that the court should have given an option of fine. Having read the proceedings, the counsel for the appellants was right in abandoning the other grounds as the case against the appellants was proved sufficiently. The appellants admitted that they trespassed onto the complainant's parcel of land. But was the sentence excessive? Section 11 of the Trespass Act provides two modes, namely imprisonment for a period of not less than two months or a fine not exceeding Kshs. 500/=. The court chose the custodial sentence. I was told that the appellants had served 9 out of the 30 days they had been imprisoned. Taking into consideration all the factors herein, I do order that beside the 9 days they had served the appellants shall pay a fine of Kshs. 500/= (Five Hundred) each and in default they complete the remaining 21 days in custody. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and delivered at Kisumu this 27th day of November, 2014.

page 1 of 2

H.K.CHEMITEI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.