REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO. 110 OF 2012 REPUBLIC……………………….PROSECUTOR VERSUS JOSHUA OREU KONYOKIE…………ACCUSED RULING 1. Mr. Kaburi, holding brief for Sagwe, counsel for the accused made an oral application on 23 rd October, 2014 for bond for his client. Mr. Kaburi says the state was given up to 25 th to file their response, to show cause why the accused may not be released on bond. Mr. Otieno for the state, on the other hand said although they are yet to file their response, the state has no compelling reason to oppose the application. In the other words, they were not opposing the application. 2. The accused is charged with the offence of murder under section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The charge sheets states that on 23 rd May, 2012 at Lolgorian Trading Centre in Transmara District within Narok County, Joshua Oreu Konyokie murdered Stephen Musiani. He denies the offence. He now applies for bond. 3. Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution makes murder bailable, provided that there are no compelling reasons to deny bond. Otherwise bail pending a charge or trial, on reasonable conditions a prima facie allowable.. 4. The pre-bail or pre-trial assessment report, which is in court, is favourable. 5. Accordingly, I allow the application and release the accused on personal bond of kshs. 1,000,000 with two sureties of similar amount to be approved by the Deputy Registrar of this court. 6. Upon his release, the accused shall attend court for mention of his case once a month until the case is heard and determined. The first such a mention shall be on 4th December, 2014. Dated and delivered at KISII this 7th day of November, 2014. C.B. NAGILLAH, JUDGE. In the presence of:Omwega holding brief for Sagwe for the applicant. State absent for the respondent. Edwin Mongare Court clerk.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.