Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Josephine Kwamboka Kinaro

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO. 89 OF 2012 REPUBLIC………………………………………………………………………………PROSECUTOR VERSUS JOSEPHINE KWAMBOKA KINARO……………………..…….........……………………..ACCUSED RULING 1. This is an oral application made on 13th October, 2014 by counsel for the accused to review bond terms to make it affordable for the accused person. The accused was charged for murder, contrary to section 203 as read with 204 of the penal code. It is alleged that the accused Josephine Kwamboka Kinaro murdered James Kinaro Mauti on the 24th day of June, 2012 at Nyagesengi village, Boisanga 1 sub-location, Nyamira North District within Nyamira County in the Republic of Kenya. 2. The accused applied for bond before Justice Mureithi. He granted bail to the accused in the following terms:a. The accused will deposit cash bail of kshs. 100,000 in court. b. The Accused provide (1) surety in the sum of kshs. 300,000/-. c. The accused shall not leave the jurisdiction of the court without leave of court. d. The accused will attend the Deputy Registrar every 30 days pending hearing and determination of her trial. 3. The court’s review, on review application will be as follows:a. The cash bail of kshs. 100,000 is hereby cancelled as per court order (a) of the court order dated 13th June, 2013. b. Order (b) thereof is reviewed upwards of kshs. 500,000 personal bond with (1) one surety of similar amount. c. Order (c) and (d) remain operative. 4. It is so ordered.

page 1 of 2

Dated and delivered at KISII this 11th day of November, 2014. C.B. NAGILLAH, JUDGE. In the presence of:Onyancha for Masese for the applicant. Otieno for the state for the respondent. Edwin Mongare Court Clerk.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.