Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Application for orders of inhibition over L. R. Nyambene/Antubetwe/858 pending Meru High Court Succession Cause No. 506 of 2010

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISC APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2014 MWAMATI MUTUMA M'LIMBINE..................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS RAEL ITURA M'IKANATHA & ANO.................................................1ST RESPODENT DAVID KAINGA M'LIMBINE..........................................................2ND RESPONDENT RULING This application is dated 17th day of October, 2014 and seeks orders: 1. THAT the Honourable court be pleased to certify this application most urgent and the same be heard exparte in the first instance. 2. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to issue orders of inhibition over all that parcel of land known as L. R. Nyambene/Antubetwe/858 pending the hearing and determination of MERU HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 506 OF 2010. 3. THAT costs of this application be provided for. The application was heard interpartes on 28.10.2014. The applicant relied on grounds on the face of the record and on the supporting affidavit of the applicant who claims to be a son of the owner of the suit land. The respondents merely denied the applicant's claim. As the orders sought are meant to subsist until Meru High Court Succession Cause No.506 of 2010 is heard and determined, Prayer 2 of the application is allowed. Costs shall be in the cause. It is so ordered. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 28th day of October, 2014 in the presence of: Cc. Daniel/Lilian Maganga for Applicant Rael Itwa – 1st Defendant

page 1 of 2

David Kainga – 2nd Defendant P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.