Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 228 of 2014

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU PETITION NO. 11 OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM ENSHRINED IN UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 27, 40, 47, 48, AND 50 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA BETWEEN M'THURANIRA M'IGUATHU.................................................................................1ST PETITIONER CHARLES MUUNA...............................................................................................2ND PETITIONER MUKIIRA IGUARA.................................................................................................3RD PETITIONER VERSIS THE LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER IGEMBE/TIGANIA ADJUDICATION AREA.......................................................................................................................1ST RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL........................................................................................2ND RESPONDENT STEPHEN MURIMI M 'IKUNYUA....................................................................INTERESTED PARTY RULING This application is dated 6.5.2014 and seeks orders: 1. That this honourable court be pleased to extend the Limited period to join the Applicant LUKE KALWIGI THURUANIRA to be the legal representative of the 1st petitioner who died on 23.2.2013. 2. That this honourable court be pleased to order the removal of the interested party from the proceedings herein as he is now deceased. 3. That the costs of the application be provided It is supported by the following grounds: a) pending. That the 1st petitioner and interested party died while these proceedings were

page 1 of 2

b) That the 1st petitioner has since applied to be the legal representative of the 1st petitioner and he has been issued with a grant. c) That there is no one interested to be a legal representative of the interested party who in any case is not a compulsory party and his family has declined to take up the grant as legal representative d) That this application is necessary to expedite the hearing of the matter It transpired during hearing that the Interested Party was removed from the proceedings by consent on 26.11.2012. The parties, by consent, as the court to allow prayer 1. In the circumstances, prayer 1 is allowed with costs to be in the cause. Delivered in open court at Meru this 15th day of October, 2014 in the presence of: Cc Lilian/Daniel Kiongo for Respondents Ndubi for Interested Party Gikunda Anampiu for Petitioners. P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.