Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samuel Ntoiti M'mborothi v The County Council of Nyambene

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISC. APPLICATION NO. 17 OF 2013 SAMUEL NTOITI M'MBOROTHI......................................APPLICANT VERSUS THE COUNTY COUNCIL OF NYAMBENE.....................RESPONDENT RULING This application is dated 14th May, 2014 and seeks orders: 1. THAT the Respondent herein County Council of Nyambene be substituted with the County Government of Meru. 2. THAT the applicant be granted leave of the Honourable Court to amend the application in terms of the annexed draft application. 3. THAT the cost of this Application be in the cause. It is grounded upon the following grounds: a. THAT it has become necessary to amend the Application to bring on board the County Government of Meru in view of the change of the system of government and the ushering in of the new Constitution dispensation. b. THAT upon transition the county Government of Meru took over the duties, functions, responsibilities and liabilities of the County Council of Nyabembe. c. THAT it is, therefore, that for continuity and final conclusion of this matter the said County Government of Meru be substituted as the Respondent in this matter in place of County Council of Nyambene. c. THAT it is in interest of justice that reliefs sought be granted. The application is meant to bring in the county Government of Meru as the respondent in accordance with the dictates of the new Constitutional dispensation. The application is hereby allowed.

page 1 of 2

Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 22nd day of October, 2014 in the presence of: Cc Daniel/Lilian Muthamia h/b Baithami for applicant P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.