Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Peter Mukaria v Abdulahi Halake & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL SUIT NO. 99 OF 2005 PETER MUKARIA.......PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT V ABDULAHI HALAKE..................1ST DEFENDANT ARON ALEKE.....................2ND DEFENDANT JATARI JILLO..................3RD DEFENDANT DIBA WAKO..............................4TH DEFENDANT RULING 15/10/2014, this court directed that Notice be issued in terms of Order 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules that the parties do come to court on 4/11/2014 to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. I have satisfied myself that the requisite notice was properly issued. I confirm that no step was taken in this matter between 10/11/09 and 30/6/13 and between 20/6/13 and 22/7/14. On 4/11/2014 none of the parties showed up in court to show cause, to the satisfaction of this court, why this suit should not be dismissed. I find that no cause has been shown as to why I should not dismiss this suit. In the circumstances, this suit is dismissed with no orders as to costs. It is so ordered. Delivered in open Court at Meru this 14th day of November, 2014. Cc. Arimi/Lilian Igweta holding brief for Kimathi Kiara for plaintiff. P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.