Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Fatuma Adan Kala v The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION JR NO. 235 OF 2013 BETWEEN FATUMA ADAN KALA ………....................................... APPLICANT AND THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION ............................ 1ST RESPONDENT UNITED REPUBLICAN PARTY .......................... 2ND RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. The applicant, Fatuma Adan Kala, challenges the United Republic Party (“URP”) party list for Mandera County Assembly. In the Notice of Motion dated 27th June 2013, he contends that the IEBC Dispute Resolution Committee (“the Committee”) replaced his name with that of Amina Tiffow who was not on the original URP Top Up list. 2. According to the Committee’s decision in Complaint No. 81 of 2013 (Khala Fatuma Adan v URP), the Committee appraised the applicant’s case in the following manner, “The issue whether the complainant was replaced by Tiffow Amina Abdullahi who is not a member of URP and was not on the party list of nominees submitted by URP to the IEBC. No evidence has been adduced to show that Tiffow Amina Abdullahi is not a member of URP. Complaint not supported by evidence ... Dismissed. No evidence adduced that nominee is not a member of URP.” 3. The ex parte applicant complains that she was not informed of the changes in the list of proposed nominees and only read about it in the newspaper. She contends that the substitution of her name was irregular and in breach of her constitutional rights. 4. We have considered the arguments raised by the applicant and we agree with the position taken by the Committee. Our jurisdiction does not extend to reviewing the merits of the decision, we decline to interfere. 5. Even if we were inclined to review the decision, the non-joinder of Tiffow Amina Abdullahi to this matter whose nomination is challenged is fatal to the application. 6. The application is dismissed with no order as to costs. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 12th July 2013

page 1 of 2

MUMBI NGUGI JUDGE D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE W. K. KORIR JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.