Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Civil Division v 3.Kenneth Kwama

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL DIVISION Civil Case No. 325 Of 2012 Martin Mutisya Muthengi……………..……..….….....PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1.THE Standard Group Ltd 2.THE Standard Ltd 3.Kenneth Kwama ....………..…..….......….......…DEFENDANTS RULING 1. Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22 provides as follows “An action founded on tort may not be brought after the end of three years from the date on which the cause of action accrued: Provided that an action for libel or slander may not be brought after the end of twelve months from such date.” 2. The provisions of section 27 of the same Act (extension of the limitation period) are not applicable to actions for defamation. 3. The cause of action as pleaded in the present suit (paragraph 5 of the plaint dated 27th June 2012) accrued on 10th August 2010. The suit was filed on 29th June 2012, way out of the period of limitation referred to above. The proceedings before the Complaints Commission of the Media Council pleaded in paragraph 8 of the plaint do not afford an answer in law against a defence of limitation. At any rate no such answer in law has been brought to the attention of the court. 4. In the circumstances I will uphold the preliminary objection raised by the Defendants by notice dated 16th October 2012. The suit herein having been filed out of the statutory period of limitation, and there being no provision under statute for extension of that period, the suit is hereby struck out with costs to the Defendants. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF JULY 2013

page 1 of 2

H. P. G. WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 5TH DAY OF JULY 2013

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.