Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Albinism Society of Kenya v National Council For Persons With Disabilities & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION PETITION NO. 341 OF 2013 BETWEEN ALBINISM SOCIETY OF KENYA .............................. PETITIONER AND NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ....................... 1ST RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ............................. 2ND RESPONDENT SUKEN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .............. 3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. The petitioners have moved the court by a petition dated 2 nd July 2011 which seeks certain declarations concerning the procurement of sunscreen by the 1st respondent for the benefit of persons living with albinism. 2. The 2nd respondent published a tender for supply of sunscreen and the tender was duly awarded to the 2nd respondent, Sunken International Limited. The tender No. NCPWD/01/2013-13 was challenged before the Public Procurement Review Board (“the Board”) by Review No. 17/2013 and on 27th May 2013, the Board dismissed the Review. 3. When the petitioners moved the court by petition on 2nd July 2013, Justice Korir granted a conservatory order restraining the respondent from carrying on with the transaction of execution of the tender awarded to the 3 rd respondent by the 1st respondent vide contract reference No. NCPWD/01/2012-2013 on or around 13th day of June 2013 for supply of Sunscreen Lotions with sunscreen protection to persons with disabilities pending inter-parties hearing. 4. When the matter came up today, the respondents opposed the extension of the conservatory orders, inter alia, on the ground that the orders were injurious to parties with disability and that the procurement had been done in accordance with the law.

page 1 of 2

5. In view of the decision by the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board dated 27 th May 2013 and section 100 of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, 2005 the conservatory order ought to be discharged. I note from the decision that the time for appeal under the Act had lapsed when the appeal to the Board was filed. 6. Furthermore, I think it is the interests of the petitioners that the sunscreen products be procured for the benefit of person living with albinism. 7. The other issue raised by the petitioners concerns the census of persons living with albinism and related issues. These issues can be dealt with by the court and the court will grant relief where necessary. 8. The conservatory orders issued on 2nd July 2013 be and are hereby discharged. This matter shall be mentioned on 10th July 2013 for further orders/directions. Notice to issue. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 8th July 2013 D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.