Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Okiya Omtatah Okoiti v Attorney General & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION PETITION NO. 342 OF 2013 BETWEEN OKIYA OMTATAH OKOITI ............................................ PETITIONER AND ATTORNEY GENERAL ....................................... 1ST RESPONDENT THE SECRETARY OF THE TEACHERS SERVICE COMMISSION .............. 2ND RESPONDENT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION ....................................................... 3RD RESPONDENT SECRETARY TO THE CABINET ........................ 4TH RESPONDENT RULING The issue of the constitution of the Teachers Service Commission has been dealt with by my judgment in Petition No. 334 of 2013 where the Court has given a decision which will guide the appointment of the Chairperson and members of the Commission. The decision will now be implemented and the effect of prayer No. (iv) and (vi) of the petition dated 1st July 2013 will be to nullify that decision as that decision which seeks to give effect to the provisions of Article 249 of the Constitution. Accordingly prayers (iv) and (vi) of the Petition dated 1st July 2013 are hereby struck out. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 8th July 2013

page 1 of 2

D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE FURTHER ORDER: The petition is marked as withdrawn with no orders as to costs. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 8th July 2013 D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE Mr Nguring’a instructed by Ishmael and Company Advocates for the petitioner. Mr Kaumba, Litigation Counsel, instructed by the State Law Office, for the respondents. Mr A. Sitima instructed by the Teachers Service Commission.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.