REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU CIVIL APPEAL NO. 140 OF 2011 MADRIS MUKWAMBIRO MUCHIRI.............. 1ST APPLICANT/PROTESTOR JUDITH RUNJI MUCHIRI JOHN ………………2ND APPLICANT/PROTESTOR LOISE MARIGU MUCHIRI ………………….. 3RD APPLICANT/PROTESTOR VERSUS NJERU MUCHIRI ……..……....................................... RESPONDENT (An Appeal from the Judgment M.W MUTUKU SRM sitting at Runyenjes in succession Cause No. 81 of 2010 delivered on 4/11/2011). DIRECTIONS I have had an opportunity of reading through this appeal file and High Court Misc. application number 209/12. This appeal arises out of a Judgment in Runyenjes Succession Cause No.81/10. As this appeal remains pending the Appellants filed Misc. Application No.209/12 seeking orders of stay of the decree in Runyenjes Succession Cause number 81/10 against one SAM NJUE MUCHIRI who is not a party in the said cause or this pending appeal. The application filed therein is not based on any pleadings. If anything it is based on this appeal which does not involve the said SAM NJUE MUCHIRI. I find this Misc. Application to be an abuse of the due process of this Court. If the Appellants have any issues with the said Sam Njue Muchiri they should follow the right process to ventilate their grievances. What they are doing through the Misc. application is unprocedural and unacceptable. 1. I therefore strike out Misc. Application No.209/12 with costs. 2. The Deputy Registrar to follow up the Runyenjes file which has not been forwarded inspite of this appeal having been filed in 2011. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT EMBU IN OPEN COURT THIS 3 RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. H.I. ONG'UDI JUDGE In the presence of:M/s Nyaga for Kathungu for Respondent Mr. Nyagena for Kariithi for Applicant NJue – C/c
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.