Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mwangi Kiongo v Peter Maina Mwaura David Maina Mwaura

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI SUCCESSION CASE NO. 403 OF 2003 MWANGI KIONGO.......................................…........................DECEASED AND PETER MAINA MWAURA DAVID MAINA MWAURA …................................................PETITIONERS RULING 1. By a summons General dated 8th February 2011 the applicants herein moved court under the provisions of Rule 73 of the Probate & Administration rules for ORDERS 2. i) THAT the grant confirmed by the Honourable court on the 5th December 2005 be amended by inclusion of the following items: 3. a. Shares with Barclays Bank (K) Ltd. 4. b. Shares with Muhotetu Farmers Company Ltd. 5. ii) THAT the shares so included be shared equally between Cecilia Wairimu Mwaura and Grace Thithu Mwaura. 6. 7. The application is supported by the affidavit of David Maina Mwaura sworn on 11th February 2011 the content of which is self explanatory. 8. Rule 73 of the P&A provides as follows v 9. “Nothing in these rules shall limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the court to make orders that may be necessary for the end of justice or to present abuse of the process of court”. 10. 11. I have considered the affidavit evident herein and is of the considered opinion that the applicant has placed material before the court for the grant of orders sought. 12. I therefore allow the said application in terms of prayer No. (i) and (ii) thereof.

page 1 of 2

13. Dated at Nyeri this 4th day of July 2013. J. WAKIAGA JUDGE Ruling delivered in open court on 19th July 2013 in the absence of the parties and their advocates. J. WAKIAGA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.