Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lesiit, J Republic v Harun Mbae Kibiti & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU HCCR NO. 54 OF 2013 LESIIT, J REPUBLIC……………………………………………………..PROSECUTOR VERSUS HARUN MBAE KIBITI………………………………………… 1ST ACCUSED DENIS MUNENE……………………………………………….2ND ACCUSED TITUS MURITHI………………………………………………..3RD ACCUSED. RULING The Applicants are accused persons in this case facing a charge of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code. Their application is dated 1st July, 2013. It has been brought under Article 49 (i) (l) of Constitution. It seeks: 1. That on the first instance this application be certified as urged and the same be heard on a priority basis. 2. That the accused/applicants be admitted to bail pending the hearing and determination of the case herein or such terms as the honourable court may deem fit and just. 3. That the honourable court do make further or better orders as may meet the ends of justice. It is premised on grounds on the face of the application namely: a. That this case is fixed for mention on 20th day of August, 2013. b. That the applicants are languishing in custody since the 3rd June, 2013. c. That no prejudice will be occasioned to the prosecution. It is supported by an affidavit sworn by 1 st accused on his behalf and those of co-accused. Notably the affidavit annexes a document allegedly from Registrar of the High Court. There is a further supporting affidavit in which the 1 st accused has annexed some document allegedly

page 1 of 2

from Presbyterian Teachers College, Rubate, it appears to be an past examination paper with aggregate mark of 39/70 and bearing names Mbaya Harun. I have had occasion to peruse the police file containing the statements of witnesses who will be called to testify in this case. It is abundantly clear that the all 3 accused persons are related. It is also clear that their places of abode is well known. And they are well known and can easily be found in case in they choose to jump bail. Considering the statement I have the impression that there is no likelihood that any of the accused persons will interfere with witnesses or that they may pause a danger if released on bail. I will grant bail to the accused persons on the following terms 1. Each accused will sign a personal bond in the sum of Ksh.100,000/2. Each accused will provide a surety each in the sum of Kshs. 2,000,000/3. This matter will be mentioned 11th November, 2013 with a view of fixing a hearing date. SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 25TH J. LESIIT JUDGE DAY OF JULY 2013.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Lesiit, J Republic v Harun Mbae Kibiti & 2 others — Original judgment | Caselaw